About Me

Name: John Sullivan
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

To we Florida Voters who want to vote for "None of the Above!"

This applies to Florida voters like myself who would rather jump off the Tampa Skyline (no kidding here) before voting for John McCain, and would rather die of excruiciatingly slow AIDS before voting for either Obama or Clinton. I want to thank Nancy for so quickly providing an answer to my question that pretty much is self-evident in nature.

I will vote for Conservatives first, Republicans second, and the leftovers if the ballot is "none of the above" for the General Election. But I appreciate this feedback from the Pinellas County Officials who confirm that I can vote for local, State and National figures based on their trust in the individual American and the right to the guarantee of the opportunity to see (and not to get, as the Dems would tell you) life, liberty, and the pursuite of happiness ...

But it's true, I'll be voting for some obscure write-in for President, because I can't stand the thought of any of the ringmasters of this 3-ring circuis actually running this country:

QUOTE:

Dear Mr. Sullivan,

 

There are several announced write-in candidates who are running for President. For a list of the candidate names, you may check the Florida Division of Election's website: http://election.dos.state.fl.us/cand/CanList.asp. Any name with (WRI) after it is a write-in candidate. The November ballot will have a space for voters to write in a candidate name. However, only votes for actual write-in candidates who have qualified will be counted.

 

Sincerely,

 

Nancy Whitlock

Communications Director

Pinellas County Supervisor of Elections Office

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Florida Bishop's Marching Orders: Fish AND Cut Bait!

CAPTAIN'S BLOG: STARDATE 10

The first few years since retirement from the Navy were not easy ones for me, but I made a difficult choice even more difficult when deciding to come to St. Petersburg, Florida in the Fall of 2003. In 2002 I came here for the first time, and hearing a radio station on the air called Spirit FM and I was duly impressed. It sounded very much like a station heard elsewhere called K-Love, but the DJ's were talking about real life issues, and not what I normally find on Florida religious radio stations, and that is some guy telling us in a contrived distortion of the human language pattern God hates gays and that God wants women to sit in the back row, hide their faces with veils, and shut up. Actually, I think God becomes confused with the views and opinions of St. Paul speaking to a 1st Century friend named Timothy, but that's beside the point. I remember staying in a cheap hotel on 34th Street at the end of U.S. 19 in St. Petersburg and remember gunshots and police sirens throughout the night. It was then that I decided I should probably move to Orlando instead after retirement from the Navy, because at least I knew that city well. I wanted to come down here and work as a Defense Contractor, and to my amazement and dismay, those jobs still elude me, for unknown reasons.

But, by happenstance I got a second chance to visit St. Petersburg only by the alignment of cities. I was on a last-ditch whirlwind tour through the State to decide where to move, which brought me through Tallahassee, Panama City, Jacksonville, Titusville, Melbourne, West Palm Beach, Fort Lauderdale, the Keys, Alligator Alley, Naples, Fort Meyers, and Sarasota. There was only one way back, and that was through the Tampa Bay Area.

I took a wrong turn, and ended up on the wrong bridge. The sun was out this time, and so were some of the best people I had ever met in my life. I decided to buy a map and spend a few days here. I have never regretted that decision - well, not often or for long.

On my second tour, the first thing I noticed about the Tampa Bay Area, a wide landscape now encapsulating far more than simply the large cities of Tampa and St. Petersburg was that the place had more strip bars per capita than Shinjuku, a suburb of Tokyo well known for its debauchery and tolerance for the mega-trillion dollar sex industry. The second thing I noticed was that there seemed to be an incredible diverse population that unlike Atlanta, San Francisco, New York, and other places, did not necessarily have "ethnic" neighborhoods - although this is changing rapidly in some places where there now appear to be more Mexicans here than Cubans, and they congregate into their own little communities, wanting none of the assimilation that other recent arrivals are experiencing and in fact enjoying.

The third thing I noticed was just how good this Spirit FM radio station was, if only because the rest of the Tampa Bay radio market is so pitiful against other markets of similar size, starting with neighboring Orlando. It is no lie that Pensacola even does better. (Salem's WGUL a few years ago made a transition from "Oldies" to talk, yet this improvement does not make up for the delta between the Tampa market and cities as small as Pensacola or Gainesville). Well, I told my self, filled with ambition for life after the Navy, I would just come here to show the boys here how to make big-market shows out of a small town mentality. Well, no. ClearChannel, Genesis and Salem don't really care that it's so bad, or that half of the stations are nothing but a computer drive connected to an antenna.  Apparently, the listeners, the captive audience don't seem to mind, either - or know what they're missing, because hosts are renewed and ads seem to sell to the satisfaction of the local groups running this pathetic market.

So thus, I quickly found that Spirit FM was my station of choice. It had all of the things I loved about the radio ... a little traffic, a little news, and a lot of fun, and the added advantages of prayer lines and song requests. While I lament that the local market has no idea how miserable the aggregate is here, cities all over the U.S. don't know how unfortunate they are that they don't have a Spirit FM in their town. Then one day, even while I was visiting, I heard someone interview a very personable voice who the interviewer simply called "Bishop Lynch." Ah, there go the Methodists again, I smirked to myself, sure that the host of the interview simply didn't know he was supposed to say "Your Excellency" when addressing a Bishop. 

But before I left town, I heard a Catholic Mass on the radio, and it was unlike any Catholic Mass I had heard in quite a while. To have a Catholic Mass with a professional broadcast sound on a high-powered FM transmitter was a first. To have such a broadcast originating from the center of a huge metropolitan area, and not from some neighborhood pirate wires atop a hidden apartment complex was stunning. And to stop at traffic light after traffic light to discover that so many cars were listening with me ... that was the hook that brought me solidly into St. Petersburg after retirement from the Navy. I mean, this simply doesn't happen in "The Bible Belt," in English, in a huge diverse metropolitan city.

But it does here.
 
The fourth thing I noticed as I was going through a WalMart parking lot, seeing Rosaries and Crosses hanging from many car windows as a popular "hip" thing to do, with no one ashamed to be wearing crosses, even at work, was that here, no one gets noticed for being religions - or for not being religious, for that matter. This was a new experience for me, and I now realize that this is also a giant hub for many world religions of every faith and belief, all the way out into Scientology in the left field corner of Pinellas County to the esteemed Greek Orthodox Church in the North County. Here, I knew, I could be free to be myself, and be as Christian as I like, and no one would even bother to notice. Perhaps the local citizens didn't realize how good they had it here.

The fifth thing I quickly noticed was that for as many strip clubs as there were around here, there were even more Churches. It is not new to me to drive many miles past many Catholic Churches to find one I can find myself most truly at home - I was doing that from as long ago as when I drove from across the street from the very bizarre (to me, at least) 
St. Mary,  Star of the Sea Parish in Key West to St Peter's Church in Big Pine Key, run then and apparently even now by the most energetic Jesus Christ wanna-be I've met in a long time, Father Tony.

In the past, when I became disillusioned with a certain Parish or Priest, as most Catholics seem to do when all priests and whoever sets up the "rules" of local custom in the Parish Council can't be all things to all people, or produce inspiring music instead of a spine-grating sound so bad I'd rather hear shrill grinding sounds from of a dentist's drill, I just quit going to Mass to wait out the storm until at last, something of tragedy or perhaps even boredom and the misuse of idle time forced me back into Mass, hopefully not smelling of alcohol and cigarettes by the time I arrived.

Now, thanks to the dozens and dozens of Churches within driving range of any point in Pinellas County, all I have to do is wait until the assigned Parochial Vicar says Mass in a Parish with a troubled Pastor (or a Priest I find troublesome), or I just roll down the road and try out a new Parish for a while. There is no such thing as a "captive audience" here.  Actually, to my surprise, I see many of the same people in several different Parishes, and I know almost all of the local priests here. I am not so sure they know each other. We are lucky here. We have a few Pastors that I can patiently wait out, no matter how long it takes, we have a few Churches that could care less if I (or anyone else) stay or go, and we have more than our fair share, I must admit, of outstanding priests that also seem drawn to the Diocese of St. Petersburg from around the world.

I do intend, in a future Blog, to feature (and hopefully, even interview) some of my favorite local priests. Without a doubt, without hesitation, and without delay, the first will hopefully be Monsignor Thaddeus Malinowski, a retired 3-Star General of the Army Chaplain Corps who was Elvis Presley's chaplain before finding recent fame as Terri Schindler-Schiavo's lonely priest who had very little, if any support from the brother priests, surrounded by dozens of Catholic Parishes, in the center of the Diocese of St. Petersburg.  But every priest around here has their own unique story to tell. I am not even sure the Diocese would even allow such a thing, because the fact is in many Parishes when some Parish Secretary reads the General Intentions for the recovery of the mentally ill, they look right into my eyes when doing so. Well, I have made plenty of demands upon the Bishop - perhaps unreasonable and unfair ones since I have been here, and I don't think I could ever apologize enough to this Bishop, express gratitude enough to this Bishop. It took me many long years, but at last, he has taken to the podium, and publically expressed what I had been trying to tell him since soon after I arrived here.

Personally, I hope that His Excellency Bishop Robert N. Lynch has absolutely no idea who I am. As I once told him through his staff, he should not feel that I am mentally unbalanced in my lofty demands of such a Diocese with such a high concentration of priests, Parishes, and crosses hanging from the mirrors in our cars. Through complete ignorance, my unfair demands, and my unrealistic expectations, I told him many times how far off the mark I thought he was, in many areas. It is not that I had not seen him before ... I had met him many times, in fact, and still, I am not sure he ever realizes he had met me.

Well, something remarkable happened, first noticed at about the same time that retired Bishop Thomas Larkin died. The Bishop went through some sort of a transformative experience in his life - to this day I don't know what it was, but it was as sudden and dramatic as Peter throwing away the fishing nets, Saul's conversion, or even Jesus emerging from the Judean Wilderness.

I know that many Catholics not in my region and many non-Catholics elsewhere could care less, on the surface of what I'm about to say, but Bishop Lynch has, for whatever blessed reason, decided that finally, he could not ignore the same observations I had been making about the truth of what was happening behind the safety and security of the Parish walls. My own observations had been a two-fold process that first of all center on the religiously blessed region of many faiths, where on any beach or at any sports event or in any shopping mall anyone who wants to start a friendly conversation about God and Jesus Christ find themselves doing so as naturally as two travelers walking on the Road to Emmaus. Only in corporate secular settings, such as on local radio shows in most markets does one get the same public reaction usually found almost everywhere else in America: Take your religion off the stinking streets, you Bible-thumping fanatic, and leave your Church at Church, and our streets for the rest of us. Or, It's not nice to discuss politics or religion in public- especially with strangers. Or, My home is my Church, and it's between me and God. Or, They don't really want me at Church - they just want my money. Or, I was raised that way, but now I have responsibilities and I'm too busy. Or, the most painful of all, Oh, I was thinking about it before the Priest abuse scandals. Why should I waste my time having them preach to me? I've never molested anyone. 

Even so, as I said, I noticed that the public is truly tolerant of public religious discussion here, especially ecumenical (multi-faith) unity across the walls of individual denominations. I think that Spirit FM gets a lot of the credit for this, for they celebrate the Christianity of many musical talents, most of whom are not Catholic. And many of these non-Catholic music artists produce songs that are featured at the popular Teen Life Masses around this Diocese - some of my favorite Masses, especially at San Raphael's and Espiritu Santo. And many youngsters, Catholic and Protestant alike, get together and pray together whenever a popular Christian Music Artist comes to town.

Most of the priests I know here consider their best friends not to be fellow priests, but rather ministers to other faiths. This is one place where different faiths can work together - and they do - in working as one community. 

Where we have had problems, and this is the second part of my observations, is within the walls of our Churches, where a trend became almost immediately clear to me, and it only seems to have gotten worse, but for in a few Parishes, and some of these include Christ the King, Our Lady of Lourdes, and only a very few others. In the summer of 2006, on North Reddington Pier, I filmed a one-on-one ... just between me and the camera, to make a short documentary about exactly what it was I was seeing, and what I planned to do about it. It was not well done, I am told, as most viewers commented upon what the Pelicans were doing in the background as they showcased their precision flying team. I used to blame the Bishop for not working hard enough to get 20-40 year olds to Mass, and then Priests for making it such a comfortable experience for the 55+ crowd that the younger generation was not made to feel welcome, and in the end, I think we can all agree, we are all to blame. I told the Bishop of the problems many times, but my own solutions were few and far between, and perhaps unrealistic and unachievable given my limited time and resources. 

It was actually Father Argentino or the Bishop himself who first hinted at a change to soon happen in the Diocese of St. Petersburg that it completely transforms every Parish, every Parishioner, every Priest, and most importantly, everyone that is encountered by anyone inside the safe confines of Church walls once they leave. 

I did not realize, until I heard Bishop Lynch on Spirit FM from the Cathedral of St. Jude on Sunday, November 25th, just how big this effort is going to be, and how transformative it is going to be. Unlike me, the thinker with only a few fleeing ideas, he has a solid plan to, in the words of Jesus, "make all things new." This will be nothing less than the Church going into a complete 3-year "retreat," where no one will experience anything less than tremendous growth and change, in some ways towards our inner Catholic identities, and in other ways, out to embrace our common love of the Word of God already celebrated by our Protestant brothers and sisters.  

I am going to predict that by the time this 3-year project nears completion, you will see a Catholic Church in this town fitting of the religious zeal of those, Catholic and non-Catholic who are outside the Church walls. You will see the 20-40 year olds back at Mass, with their screaming babies, and with the tattoos on their arms visible through their Sunday best, and best of all, you will see the transformative power of a transformed Church at work in helping neighbors - Catholic or otherwise, when they are going through hard times. You will see the hungry fed, and jobs offered to the heartbroken victims of capitalism who want to get back on their feet. Yes, we will always have the poor, but in the end, it will only be the poor who like it that way.

I applaud the Bishop for what he has done. I encourage everyone take a good look at what he plans to do, first by reading his Pastoral Letter (Adobe PDF)

Some - if not most of the non-Catholic traditions will point out that they do not believe in the Catholic Truths of the Eucharist, and based on what they observe when they watch the lives of Catholics streaming out of their Churches to get back to life in the real world ... I really don't blame them. Perhaps it is up to us to prove ourselves by showing the power of the Eucharist in the world first, and then ... by loving others who are not considered lovable, or who are not easy to embrace love because of a bitter heart and spirit ... by really making a difference in the world, then perhaps then we can have the discussion. Personally, I have found that I need this Eucharist, and regularly so. For those of you who have completely balanced lives without such a routine in your life, I must express a perhaps un-Christ-like envy for your ability to live independent of what I seem to need so much just to get by. For now, let's not argue or debate it - for now ... let's simply agree to pray for one another. Even Pope John Paul II, when visiting his would-be assassin, said, "I will pray for you. Will you pray for me?"

In conclusion, the link worth bookmarking and returning to from time to time is The Bishop's Project Page 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pope Benedict XVI's Impractical Advice to "The Real World."

CAPTAIN'S BLOG, STARDATE 9:

The Pope's New Letter is out, released at the change of the Liturgical Year where sadly, we say goodbye to the brilliant Gospel of Luke, and welcome in the equally inspiring, earlier Gospel of Matthew, the latter written by someone who actually spent time with Jesus as a first-hand eyewitness.

The Encylical is very hard to read ... I admit that. The bottom line to the world ... "Get a life! A real, EVERLASTING life, and quit worrying so much about if it's Romney or Rodham, Briefs or Boxers, Merry Christmas or Happy Holidays! ..." 

Like those who constructed the rambling original Greek scrolls of New Testament scripture, where people would have to try to figure out where quotes and sentences end, Pope Benedict XVI writes with the goal of sending out words that will survive the test of time, that to today's generation seem to be directed towards people on another planet. Of course, it is because he is a long-term thinker, and knows that in time, this will be an underground letter where the biggest argument about it will be if the world will have to read it in Manarin or in Cantonese. But his self-contained answer is, "Don't worry about it. In time, this too will pass." This is clearly a letter from a man who knows he does not have long, and he is expressing some of the revelations that God is bringing to him through his own prayers, and he is taking this opportunity to share his findings with others.

He will go on for paragraphs putting forth a position, and then reveal that he was just quoting someone else, and then he goes to war in putting everything he had just said ... just quoted ... to shame.

But when the official Vatican release comes on line (I have only seen the leaked version - I am not sure that the Bishops - the intended audience have seen this yet) ... I am sure it will be more clear who is speaking when.

The Pope spends a lot of time on this process, which he simply calls Prayer, with humorous references to the excesses of the litanies in the past which spent too much time on mindless recital, and not the true process of opening oneself up to God.


This is a BRILLIANT work of art in which the Pope observes life, perhaps interprets it, and then gives meaning to it, for anyone and everyone, in every situation.


He spends a great deal of time offering good advice, both pragmatic and practical. In a third-person way, he gets into the mind of the average modernist, humanist, secularist, and athiest, and admits that there is a good reason these people exist and think the way they do. He even spends a great deal of time explaining their very positions with great credibility, only in the end to shoot down each and every one of those theories.


The Pope admits that the world "is going to hell in a handbasket," but then spends a great deal of time speaking about past generations who were witnessing the same things, and reaching the conclusions - only to ultimately be proven wrong.


The framework should have probably started with an underlying theme found only later in his letter ... with the observation that to each of us, everything is centered on "me" and what "I" know, experience, and observe in the course of our lives. He calls almost everything that happened before in history "external" to our lives, yet he spends a great deal of time speaking about the lives of those gone with some expectation that we are already familiar with them. Most readers are probably not, and this is why most of the Encyclical will fall upon deaf ears.

His point, of course, was that history is directly responsible for the world that is ours when we arrive as individual life on this planet, yet we need not feel that we are slaves to history. Our lives are our lives. He then spends considerable time speaking of "structure" built up around us - most of it thankfully external to us as well. Such "structure" provides and dispenses, and some cases rations or denies "our daily bread", and he is of course speaking of the increasingly efficient economic machines that thrive through the miracles of increasingly complex technology.

Then there are the structures that are within Churches and Charities themselves which as he warned in his first Encyclical can too easily be reduced to mere "structures," mechanical dispensers of food, clothes, and medicine. He certainly don't consider Robin Hood and Friar Tuck patron saints - he tell us that when Jesus fed thousands, no one who was rich had their food stolen at gunpoint in order to feed the poor.


Human "progress," the religion of the secularists and the heart of political "progressives," is at best "incremental" change towards improvement, and the Pope does not convince us of long that even he believes that "lasting peace" in this world is anything but an ignorant, foolish dream. He did not tell us, but perhaps he should, that our nostalgic memories of Bethlehem are completely delusional in many ways. Even the arrival of God on Earth did not prevent the Roman proxy to the region, King Herod, from slaughtering perhaps thousands of innocent toddlers in and around Bethlehem before Jesus the human child learned to crawl across the room. What kind of God would allow such a travesty to happen, to speak nothing of the Islamification of the Holy Land? A God who allows for human freedom in this existence, which the Pope makes abundantly clear is in and of itself a tool which is neither ultimately good nor evil, but capable of being used for both. He points out that Churches and governments both in the course of human history have decided to exercise conflicting and in many case self-destructive forms of the word "freedom," and he carries on a theme from John Paul II's many Encyclicals that celebrate liberty as an excuse to, in paraphrase of J.C. Watts, "do the right thing when no one is looking."


Without expressing it clearly enough, the Pope's theme is that each generation in human history has grasped for the same goals, from the colonialization of society towards huge infrastructures and cultures and cities and nations that may last across several generations before at last fading into irrelevance, collapse and ruin, and on an individual basis, a deeply seeded desire within all of us to both be happy and free, and usually equating happiness with freedom. This is perhaps why Jesus never spent much time on the geopolitical questions of his day, because Jesus knew that historical preservation of the passing world is, in many ways, a complete waste of effort. This must have seemed insane to the Jews, whose Zealots wanted Jesus to rise as the leader of a rebellion against the occupation force worse than any other, the Roman Empire. Jesus knew that in only a few decades, everything in Jerusalem would be in smoking ruins, and the Jews would be exterminated from their own city. In a few decades, everything of this omnipresent Roman Empire would be in disarray, ruin, and collapse.

Perhaps today Jesus would remind us that all of our technological and culturals marvels ... our subways, our airports, our nations, our music, our economies, our launch pads, and even our skyscrapers will be laid waste by the sands of history to come. It is the human thing to do, to try to craft immortality out of the stones and sands of Earth. Long ago, when the first Vatican Basilica fell in upon itself, humanity's answer was to go into deep Church debt to construct something even bigger and better which will, of course, eventually prove less than immortal.

But of course, the Pope does keep things in perspective. In the view of human history, few of us watch the airplane we are on go into a skyscraper, or the skyscraper we are in set ablaze by a jetliner. Few of us watch an atom bomb fall into our skies from above and explode, turning even elementary schools into fiery tombs. We of course lament the human loss in these events more than all, but what seems so shocking to us even more than anything else is when our human creations ... the things prove to be as mortal as we are, not eternal by any stretch of the imagination. When the human devices made to lift us into space and hold air pressure through a fiery reentry fail, or when the human devices made to suspend our offices hundreds of feet over the ground, or when the human devices made to hold us safely thousands of feet in the air fail, we are reminded that sometimes, our human progress is no less mortal than we are.


Yet, the entire Insurance industry survives on the bet that our "things" will outlast us. His whole point in the Encyclical is on his bet that human souls will outlast even the world. He finds human structure, from Islam to the popular Protestant fractures of the day to even the trappings of his own Church to be in a constant state of decomposition and mortality. He not only says this is true today, but it has always been, is now, and shall ever be so long as humans are on the planet. Again, he returns to a focus on the individual, and the everyday strugles of life, which he states emphatically must be practically faced without escapism. He notes through life, everyone is in search of a comfortable life with "happiness," for themselves - a "good quality of life," is what the individual seeks, yesterday, today, and tomorrow. He condems the goal of sacrifice today simply for the promise of a better today and tomorrow for others - the central philosophies of many religious and secular movements, for in practice these have led to failure, a removal of human freedom, and a far worse life down the road to everyone involved. If the Pope were to put a name on "the Beast" of the Apocalypse, it would be this illusion contained within the promise of "a better tomorrow," that in turn guarantees total ruin and destruction of every victim of this "Beast," and in time, the death and destruction of the "Beast" itself after a limited amount of time.


Again, the Pope internalizes the argument to the self-aware living human, and what we want out of life. He expertly delivers a message already contained in the Bible - the way to true happiness is to not live a "happy" life, but rather a "blessed" life that in truth is best experienced when someone with two coats gives one to someone with none, not because of "external" forces requiring one to do so, such as taxes, but rather because of a "blessed" application of human freedom.


The Pope's message provides very little practical advice for anyone just trying to be "successful" or "happy" in this life. On the contrary, the Pope does not condemn this human yearning for happiness and love - he simply concludes that these things are admirable so long as we can become greedy enough to realize true happiness and love that simply does not exist in "the real world" is in fact achievable, and the only way to truly become aware of happiness and love is to see beyond "the real world," and through prayer, to seek an "eternal world" that will survive us and everything around us. Yet, he warns us not to fall into the trappings of Catholic or other religious cults, that seek to evade life's realities. Jesus endured "the real world" even onto the Cross, and we must live our lives in this world in a practical way in "the real world."


Yet, he says that within us, we can often be "so full of ourselves" that God literally can't enter our lives, because we have made no room for Him. Yet, in a process of prayer that allows us to pour out some of the junk in our lives, or to simply enlarge ourselves to make room for God, He can live this "real world" with us, helping us along every step in the way, to know real happiness on Earth when we see it, to help us to share this joy and hope for happiness with others, and best of all, realizing in confidence that happiness is right around the corner in a certain afterlife that will exist long after everything else is gone. It almost seems that God actually enjoys "the real world," and after all, it was all created to please and entertain, and perhaps to disappoint Him from time to time. Jesus came with a heavenly message - not to become embroiled in geopolitics - Jesus knew it was all short-sighted vanity to even waste any time worrying about human inventions like the Roman Empire. Thus the same goes for China or the United States - in time they will be gone, in a pile of decomposing destruction and ruin. But human nature and the hope of life after death - that's what Jesus was all about, and in fact, why He was here for us then, and God willing, should we accept the mission, here for us today.

So says the Pope. I agree. Against all of this, the "modern" world view is about as irrelevant as the Roman Empire, in time, came to be.

Personally, I hope this Pope Benedict survives to write many more letters. Amidst the competing opinions of the free market of ideas, his often seem to be the most clear - once you get through the sidebars.

Pope Benedict XVI's impractical advice to "The Real World" is very good advice to the humans now living in it.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »